There are linkages here between farmer objectives for productive and profitable crop production, water company objectives for reducing pesticides in water, and environmental objectives for the conservation of aquatic wildlife affected by sediment. Compacted, poorly functioning soils have a negative impact on each of these. Because sediment clogs drainage channels downstream, there are also implications for flood risk management. The herbicide is at the centre of a web of interacting issues.
By using four years of herbicide
concentration data from the study catchments in our Water Friendly Farming project, together with rainfall, stream
flow, and crop area data, our partners at York University could estimate that,
to keep the herbicide concentration below the 0. 1µg/L limit, we would need to restrict the oilseed rape
area to less than 5% of the catchment area.
Additional or complementary mitigation options include extending the
rotation with vigorous hybrid barley which can compete against black-grass, reducing
tillage intensity, and monitoring soil moisture and compaction to guide
herbicide applications and soil management to reduce runoff.
We put these options to the
farmers in one of our study catchments.
In some years the oilseed rape area is around 5% of the catchment, but
in others it is up to 30%. It depends
which part of each farm's rotation is within the catchment boundary in any one year. How could land use be coordinated so that the
5% limit was not exceeded? The consensus was that it could not! Such a restriction would impose too heavily
on the economics of the farm business and create tensions between neighbouring
farms who do not normally work together. Multiple tenure arrangements between
neighbouring farms complicate the issue, and as small farms are increasingly managed by
contractors, this restricts long-term planning and makes timely operations more
difficult. There was also concern about
the economic risks associated with adopting a no-tillage approach to reduce erosion on clay soils, and a lack of long-term government support for more
sustainable soil management.
Introducing hybrid barley into the
rotation was well received as a means of extending the rotation and controlling
black-grass, a principle that has additional potential benefits for pest and disease control, and for farmland wildlife. There was also interest amongst the farmers in
improving understanding of compaction with a view to carefully targeted
management that would reduce erosion and improve crop performance. And while farmers were reluctant
to collaborate, they agreed that there was an important coordination role for
local trusted advisors.
Because of its adoption of rigorous science in a landscape scale practical setting, the Water Friendly Farming project provides an excellent platform for understanding constraints and opportunities for developing future land use policy and practice. As a result of this recent exercise, we all have a better understanding of how a wide range of
objectives interact, where the constraints are, and what potential
opportunities we could explore to meet the multiple objectives we all have for
agricultural landscapes.